Type describes treatment quality.
BC’s classifications describe the effluent leaving the treatment process. They do not identify the distribution method. Type 2 and 3 have progressively tighter effluent limits than septic-tank treatment alone.
How hydraulic loading rate changes the area.
Hydraulic loading rate (HLR) is the daily volume applied per square metre of infiltrative surface, in L/day/m². The SPM assigns different maxima by effluent type. Selection also considers soil condition and permeability, using the lower applicable result and required adjustments.
The area calculation
Required infiltrative area = daily design flow ÷ selected HLR
One example: the same 1,800 L/day design flow.
For favourable sand or loamy sand, Table II-22 lists the following maxima. This illustration assumes permeability results and the other site checks support those rates.
Here, Type 2 needs 50% less infiltrative area than Type 1. These rates are an example, not standard rates for every property.
Less area does not
necessarily mean less length.
Linear loading rate (LLR) limits daily flow per metre along the land’s contour. Its selection depends on receiving soil, depth and slope. A higher HLR does not automatically shorten the required contour length.
Assume the selected LLR is 60 L/day per metre. The same 1,800 L/day flow requires 1,800 ÷ 60 = 30 metres of contour length in both examples below.
Type 1 · 60 m²30 m × 2 m
30 m along contour
Type 2 · 30 m²30 m × 1 m
The same 30 m length
Illustrative infiltrative rectangles. Final bed and trench layouts must meet the applicable standards.
The Type 2 area is narrower in this illustration, while its contour length stays the same.
The whole footprint still matters.
Setbacks, spacing, access, cover and side slopes affect total space. Sand mounds also need separate sand-media and native-soil basal-area checks; the example above is not a mound-footprint calculation.
Choosing the system.
We bring the site assessment, treatment requirements, pressure distribution and timed-dosing options together. Mike plans Type 1 and 2 systems within his ROWP scope; Type 3 work is coordinated with an appropriately qualified professional.
Sources: BC Sewerage System Regulation, sections 1 and 6; BC SPM v3 (2014), Volume II, sections 5.5–5.6, Tables II-22, II-23 and II-26–II-28 (pages II-34–II-41). Calculations and rectangles are illustrative.